Structural phase transitions using GGA + U
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
Structural phase transitions using GGA + U
I'm investigating the structural phase transitions of Nd under pressures using the GGA+U method. However, I can't get
reasonable results.
For example, experimentally, Nd is the dhcp (double hexagonal close-packed) structure at ambient conditions, and at a
pressure around 4 GPa a structural phase transition to the fcc structure is observed.
However, according to my calculations, under low pressures the energies of the fcc are less than those of the dhcp for
the same cell volumes, that means the fcc structure is energetically more favorable than the dhcp structure.
I have tested many cases of J and U setting, and can not get ideal results.
I tested the following cases:
Dudarev's scheme (LDAUTYPE = 2): U =1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 eV
Liechtenstein's scheme (LDAUTYPE = 1):
J=1 --> U=2,3,4,5 eV
J=2 --> U=3,4,5,6 eV
All of above cases give the results that the fcc is more stable than the dhcp under low pressures (around -1 ~ 1 GPa).
==============================================================
System = Nd: P63/mmc dhcp
GGA = 91
ISMEAR = 1
SIGMA = 0.2
ICHARG = 1
ISPIN = 2
MAGMON = 4*4
VOSKOWM = 1
AMIX = 0.2
BMIX = 0.0001
AMIX-MAG = 0.8
BMIX-MAG = 0.0001
NSW = 199
IBRION = 2
ISIF = 4
EDIFF = 0.000001
EDIFFG = -0.002
PREC = HIGH
LDAU = .TRUE.
LDAUTYPE = 1
LDAUL = 3
LDAUU = 5
LDAUJ = 1
LMAXMIX = 6
NBANDS = 60
=================================================
I attached the INCAR.
Looking forward to get helps !!!
reasonable results.
For example, experimentally, Nd is the dhcp (double hexagonal close-packed) structure at ambient conditions, and at a
pressure around 4 GPa a structural phase transition to the fcc structure is observed.
However, according to my calculations, under low pressures the energies of the fcc are less than those of the dhcp for
the same cell volumes, that means the fcc structure is energetically more favorable than the dhcp structure.
I have tested many cases of J and U setting, and can not get ideal results.
I tested the following cases:
Dudarev's scheme (LDAUTYPE = 2): U =1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 eV
Liechtenstein's scheme (LDAUTYPE = 1):
J=1 --> U=2,3,4,5 eV
J=2 --> U=3,4,5,6 eV
All of above cases give the results that the fcc is more stable than the dhcp under low pressures (around -1 ~ 1 GPa).
==============================================================
System = Nd: P63/mmc dhcp
GGA = 91
ISMEAR = 1
SIGMA = 0.2
ICHARG = 1
ISPIN = 2
MAGMON = 4*4
VOSKOWM = 1
AMIX = 0.2
BMIX = 0.0001
AMIX-MAG = 0.8
BMIX-MAG = 0.0001
NSW = 199
IBRION = 2
ISIF = 4
EDIFF = 0.000001
EDIFFG = -0.002
PREC = HIGH
LDAU = .TRUE.
LDAUTYPE = 1
LDAUL = 3
LDAUU = 5
LDAUJ = 1
LMAXMIX = 6
NBANDS = 60
=================================================
I attached the INCAR.
Looking forward to get helps !!!
Last edited by shihongting on Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: Structural phase transitions using GGA + U
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP