Hi,
I've been trying to perform VASP calculations for my system, especially organic molecules on semiconductor surface.
The calculations are O. K. in case of geometry optimization.
However, I can not find transition state with NEB method.
Each of the images do not converge even after 1000 runs.
I'm afraid I have used inapproprate variables in INCAR options, or that it may be difficult to find transition state for organic molecule on semiconductor system.
I used 3 or 5 images.
My settings for NEB calculations are
EDIFF = 1E-05 for electronic relaxation
ICHAIN = 0
EDIFFG = -0.1
IBRION = 3
POTIM = 0.05
SMASS = 2
Please inform me any method to solve the problems.
Thanks,
Kim, Do Hwan
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Convergence problems with NEB calculations
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 4:02 am
- License Nr.: 224
Convergence problems with NEB calculations
Last edited by Kim Do Hwan on Thu Aug 04, 2005 4:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
Convergence problems with NEB calculations
for the VASP releases distributed by us, the INCAR tags to
do an NEB run are
IMAGES =
SPRING = -5
do an NEB run are
IMAGES =
SPRING = -5
Last edited by admin on Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:53 am
- License Nr.: 866
- Location: U.S.
Convergence problems with NEB calculations
I think he used the improved NEB program provided by Dr. Henkelman. In the improved NEB, ICHAIN=0 is for NEB, and SPRING=-5 is default. Maybe the small POTIM slows the convergence.
Try POTIM = 0.1 and remove SMASS parameter after some steps.
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Wed Aug 10 2005, 02:34PM ]</span>
Try POTIM = 0.1 and remove SMASS parameter after some steps.
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Wed Aug 10 2005, 02:34PM ]</span>
Last edited by Brane on Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.