Platinum surface relaxation ( what is the suitable ISIF value?)

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
neogien

Platinum surface relaxation ( what is the suitable ISIF value?)

#1 Post by neogien » Wed Dec 13, 2006 6:35 am

Hello!

I'm doing surface relaxation calculation of Platinum (111) surface.

I had completly calculated optimized lattice parameter, and made (111) layer slab.

I have no idea what value of ISIF should I use for my calculations.

Actually, I think, in real surface system the total volume of slab supercell should be fixed. So I allowed the relaxation of the cell shape and the lacation of ions in cell. (ISIF = 4)

Is this ISIF=4 reliable?

Or should I use the ISIF value 2(only the position of ions are allowed to relax) or 3(cell volume, shape and position of ions are all allowed to relax) for surface relaxation?

<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Last edited by neogien on Wed Dec 13, 2006 6:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

Platinum surface relaxation ( what is the suitable ISIF value?)

#2 Post by admin » Wed Dec 13, 2006 1:14 pm

no, cell shape relaxations are appropriate for bulk cell optimations only as well. For slabs, only the ions' positions must be relaxed, hence use ISIF<3 ( or do not set it explicitely at all)
Last edited by admin on Wed Dec 13, 2006 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply