Are there any parameters that specify the index of bands on which to evaluate QP corrections?
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:16 pm
- License Nr.: 785
Are there any parameters that specify the index of bands on which to evaluate QP corrections?
Hi all,
In a common GW calculation, are there any parameters of flags that specify the index of bands on which the quasi-particle corrections are evaluated?
I tried a small unit cell which has 18 electrons, and found in the OUTCAR that the QP corrections were evaluated for 1st - 18th band.
However, if the unit cell gets larger, the more electrons it will contain. For a unit cell that has electrons on the magnitude of 100s, the calculation will become much too expensive.
And in most cases, only the bands near VBM & CBM are of interest.
So, how to specify the index of the bands when calculating GW? e.g. If I only concern the 6 highest valence and 4 lowest conduction bands, how to specify them in INCAR?
Many thanks in advance.
In a common GW calculation, are there any parameters of flags that specify the index of bands on which the quasi-particle corrections are evaluated?
I tried a small unit cell which has 18 electrons, and found in the OUTCAR that the QP corrections were evaluated for 1st - 18th band.
However, if the unit cell gets larger, the more electrons it will contain. For a unit cell that has electrons on the magnitude of 100s, the calculation will become much too expensive.
And in most cases, only the bands near VBM & CBM are of interest.
So, how to specify the index of the bands when calculating GW? e.g. If I only concern the 6 highest valence and 4 lowest conduction bands, how to specify them in INCAR?
Many thanks in advance.
Last edited by yunhailiseu on Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: Are there any parameters that specify the index of bands on which to evaluate QP corrections?
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP