some problems about Band decomposed chargedensity
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
some problems about Band decomposed chargedensity
Dear all:
First of all, I get the converged WAVECAR from the static calculation. at the same time, I also obtain the E-fermi in the OUTCAR file, and the converged chargedensity in CHG or CHGCAR(values in some sites are negative ,I am puzzled)
then, I set "LPARD=TURE" in the INCAR . I also obtain the chargedensity in CHG or CHGCAR (the value in each site(NGXF NGZF NGZF)is active), it is not the same as the chargedensity in static calculation,why? and if I set "LPARD=TURE; NBMOD=-3;EINT=-2 2", (as the vasp maunal , the energy range is given vs. the Fermi energy.) but this E-fermi is different from the one from OUTCAR in static calculation(grep E-fermi OUTCAR).
First of all, I get the converged WAVECAR from the static calculation. at the same time, I also obtain the E-fermi in the OUTCAR file, and the converged chargedensity in CHG or CHGCAR(values in some sites are negative ,I am puzzled)
then, I set "LPARD=TURE" in the INCAR . I also obtain the chargedensity in CHG or CHGCAR (the value in each site(NGXF NGZF NGZF)is active), it is not the same as the chargedensity in static calculation,why? and if I set "LPARD=TURE; NBMOD=-3;EINT=-2 2", (as the vasp maunal , the energy range is given vs. the Fermi energy.) but this E-fermi is different from the one from OUTCAR in static calculation(grep E-fermi OUTCAR).
Last edited by xinhuanwen on Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: some problems about Band decomposed chargedensity
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP