NEB SPRING, how much is too much?

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
filipejunqueira
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:33 am

NEB SPRING, how much is too much?

#1 Post by filipejunqueira » Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:34 pm

Hi,

The official documentation states on the page about SPRING:

Do not use too large values, because this can slow down convergence. The default value usually works quite reliably.
How large is too large? Is -7.5 a too big?

merzuk.kaltak
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:39 am

Re: NEB SPRING, how much is too much?

#2 Post by merzuk.kaltak » Wed Feb 28, 2024 9:23 am

Hello,

the short answer is: "It depends". Your proposal does not seem completely unreasonable.
This is especially true, if you have a "floppy" band for the default value of -5.
By floppy band, I mean one or more local minima in energy between initial and final state appear.
Here a bigger SPRING value can definitely help to obtain a smooth energy barrier.
Bear in mind though, a too big SPRING value might force your system into wrong transition states.

Alternatively, if you know the image with the highest energy in your NEB the hill climbing method is a good alternative.
Here you would pick this image and relax it using steepest ascent and interpolate the initial and final state through this hill top image.

Post Reply